So I wrote a lot of posts around shrinking (Here, here, here). Some of my posts were turned into a wiki article on SQLServerPedia. I thought I was done posting about this but one more.
I talked about why we shouldn’t do it on a regular basis. Why it should really be reserved for use in [...]
A Picture That Says, “Don’t Shrink!” (and other things…)
by Mike Walsh on 19. Jun, 2009 in Best Practices, Learn From Mistakes, Pet Peeve, Syndicate, Troubleshooting
Manage Your Transactions (So They Don’t Manage You – Part 2)
by Mike Walsh on 16. Apr, 2009 in Best Practices, Performance, Pet Peeve, SQL Server, Shrinking & Transactions, Syndicate
This is the final in a series on shrinking and transactions. You can see them all in the Shrinking & Transactions category.
In part 1, we talked about factors that affect transaction log growth. We talked about what a SQL Server transaction is and the various modes SQL interacts with a transaction (Autocommit, Implicit Transactions and Explicit [...]
Manage Your Transactions (So they don’t manage you – Part 1)
by Mike Walsh on 09. Apr, 2009 in Best Practices, Pet Peeve, Recovery, SQL Server, Shrinking & Transactions, Syndicate
This is part 3 in a series on shrinking and transaction management. Click here for part 4. You can see them all in the Shrinking & Transactions category.
If you are one of the people who have been reading this blog, you know where I stand on shrinking databases/log files. I don’t like the practice (Post 1, Post [...]
Shrinking is a popular topic…
by Mike Walsh on 31. Jan, 2009 in DBA, SQL Server, Shrinking & Transactions, Syndicate
This is part 2 in a series on Shrinking “Best Practices” and logging. Click here for part 3. You can see them all in the Shrinking & Transactions category.
A while back I posted about not touching the shrink button. I am still finding it fun to see what search queries bring traffic to my blog [...]
- Invitation for T-SQL Tuesday #004: IO 01. Mar, 2010
-
Getting Organized – Goodbye Paper?
15. Jul, 2010
- Hey Software Vendors – Get a Clue! 02. Jul, 2010
- DBA Questions To Ask A Vendor 27. Jan, 2009
- Bill Clinton Wasn’t Impeached For… 29. Mar, 2010
-
Checklists, Recipes and Algorithms
16. Mar, 2009
- Why Should I Blog? 14. Dec, 2009
- Don’t Touch that Shrink Button! 07. Jan, 2009
- Seacoast SQL Server Users? 09. Nov, 2009
-
Plan To Fail Or Don’t Expect To Succeed
18. May, 2010
-
Life Changes – 2 For The Price Of 1
08. Jun, 2010
-
SQL Server Licensing Or Tax Forms?
27. Jul, 2010
- Tetelestai – It is Finished 11. Apr, 2009
-
Why Hire A DBA?
24. May, 2010
-
Getting Organized – A Task’s Life
19. Jul, 2010
-
NULLgarity: Enjoyed reading your Evernote series. I'm a big O...
-
Mike Walsh: Hi Natasha - That is some error to make the DB gr...
-
Natasha: I would like your opinion please. My database w...
-
Mike Walsh: Stan - The rationale makes perfect sense and it is...
-
Stan Segers: Hi John, Mike, The development undertaken is Of...
-
Mike Walsh: John - If you re-read his note I believe we are in...
-
John Cogan: Pretty certain that Stan is not license compliant,...
-
John Cogan: @Stan, since none of those bundled admin/developer...
-
Mike Walsh: that is a great point. I hadn't thought of that ei...
-
Mike Walsh: Hi Stan - I have never checked with MS specifical...
-
Abhilash Melethil: Thanks for the Post Mike!...
-
Thomas Rushton: "The catch"? Unfortunately, v5.0 of the MAP requi...
-
Stan Segers: @Mike, I do have this nice Developer Edition / Sta...
-
Mike Walsh: Thanks John! All great points. Especially about Cl...
-
John Cogan: Nice post here about licensing. Having run this g...
